Judge to Joe: NO Communication with Social Media

communication with social media, white house, biden administration,

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, restricting government agencies and officials from any communication with social media companies to moderate online content, in a landmark ruling on July 4th.

  • Lawsuit filed by Republican attorneys general alleges Biden administration exceeded its authority in pressuring tech giants to address vaccine hesitancy and potential election interference.
  • The ruling cites concerns over potential violations of the First Amendment and prohibits agencies from urging content removal protected under free speech.
  • Government can still communicate regarding crimes, national security threats, and foreign election interference, but cannot flag or request takedown reports.

In a groundbreaking ruling on July 4th, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, restricting certain government agencies and officials from engaging in communication with social media companies to moderate online content.

The lawsuit, brought forward by Republican attorneys general from Louisiana and Missouri, alleges that the Biden administration went beyond its bounds in pressuring tech giants to address content related to vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and potential election interference.

The ruling, issued by Judge Terry A. Doughty of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, cites concerns over potential violations of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Essentially, it prohibits agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI from talking to social media companies for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.” However, the judge did allow exceptions for communications related to national security risks and criminal activities.

According to a White House official, the Justice Department “is reviewing the court’s injunction and will evaluate its options in this case.”

“This Administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections,” the official said. “Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people but make independent choices about the information they present.”

Meanwhile, social media giants Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Twitter, and Google have yet to issue official statements regarding the injunction.

The court’s decision, which was first reported by The Washington Post, could have far-reaching implications for the US government’s communication with social media platforms, particularly in combating false and misleading narratives about contentious issues. It could potentially impact efforts to address disinformation, hate speech, and election interference on digital platforms.

The lawsuit’s victory marked a significant moment for Republicans, who have long claimed that social media companies disproportionately censor right-leaning content, often in collaboration with the government. Democrats, on the other hand, argue that the platforms have failed to adequately police misinformation, leading to harmful consequences, including violence.

According to the ruling, the government may still communicate with social media companies regarding posts that detail crimes, national security threats, or foreign attempts to influence elections. However, agencies are prohibited from flagging specific posts or requesting reports on content takedown efforts.

Despite the preliminary nature of the injunction, legal experts believe the case will have broader implications for free speech protections online, potentially leading to further challenges in the Supreme Court. The issue of the government’s influence over and communication with social media has become increasingly partisan, with the Republican-led House investigating related matters and introducing state laws to regulate platform content.

Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Tech sections to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.