FBI Director Kash Patel takes the oath to defend U.S. Constitution and ensure national security. Recent claims made by Nadine Barakat, a Lebanese-American citizen residing in Fairfax, Virginia, have raised significant concerns regarding national security. “Nadine sent an email to the lawyers representing the party that filed a lawsuit against her, and she also slandered all of them. Additionally, she claims to have handed documents to the FBI in a documented video on her YouTube Channel. These assertions have sparked serious questions about the authenticity of her statements and their potential impact on public safety.
She said to the lawyers : “You helped me uncover a big network and this will save lives” – see full email here
You can find the video in which she made these claims translated below:
Watch the full video here.
Key Allegations from the Video and Their Implications
- Submission of Sensitive Information to Authorities Barakat’s claim that she submitted files directly to U.S. authorities raises doubts, as such submissions typically require a formal appointment and proper documentation. Without any public acknowledgment or proof of receipt from the FBI, her assertions seem questionable, potentially undermining her credibility.
- Confusion Regarding FBI Involvement Barakat also asserts that the FBI prevented an individual from entering the U.S., yet U.S. immigration and border control are handled by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), not the FBI. This discrepancy suggests either a misunderstanding of agency roles or a potentially misleading claim, calling into question the accuracy of her story.
- “If you’re alleging that this individual is involved in money laundering, affiliated with Hezbollah, connected to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, engaged in terrorism, drug trafficking, or weapons smuggling—then why haven’t U.S. authorities or the FBI arrested him at the airport? If any of these claims were true, he would be in a federal prison by now—not freely returning to his home country. This fact alone discredits your accusations as false and defamatory. Moreover, under 18 U.S. Code § 1001, knowingly making false statements to federal authorities is a serious crime. You’ve made such statements both on video and in written form, which makes you legally accountable and subject to potential criminal prosecution, including imprisonment
Fugitive from Her Own Country
Moreover, Barakat faces multiple legal issues in Lebanon and is considered a fugitive with several court orders against her with rulings including 1 year of imprisonment, you can find the court document with the rule here. This background raises additional questions about her access to sensitive information and the potential implications for national security.
Given her proximity to government buildings and her role at a company involved in defense-related projects, the possibility of sensitive information being compromised by her cannot be ignored. The urgency for a thorough investigation by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies is needed to find out the truth and ensure that public safety and national security are not at risk.
Discrepancies in Nadine Barakat’s Claims
Since Nadine Barakat Aboushakra claims she handed documents to the FBI, there should be a record or receipt of that handover. If no such documentation exists, it casts doubt on the legitimacy of her claim and could have serious legal implications if proven false. Under 18 U.S. Code § 1001, this could lead to fines or imprisonment of up to five years. The credibility of her claims and the potential impact on national security make it imperative for these statements to be verified thoroughly by the relevant authorities.
If Ms. Barakat is truthful, it implies she has uncovered a major network and potentially saved lives, requiring an immediate investigation by U.S. law enforcement, including the FBI, CIA, and local police. This raises questions about the security apparatus and why the FBI may not have uncovered such a network. If her claims are false, they must be addressed immediately, with legal consequences for spreading misinformation that threatens national security.
Fear and Concern in Fairfax Over Nadine Barakat’s Claims
After Inside Telecom’s previous article, numerous calls were received. One call from someone close to Barakat alleged that she obtained her U.S. citizenship through illegitimate means, which raises even more questions since she is a fugitive in her home country.
Another caller from Fairfax expressed that the community is deeply worried about Barakat’s alleged ties and communications with terrorist groups. It is not easy to find out that your neighbor is affiliated with a terrorist network and is uncovering it from across the street as this network can target the whole bloc…
While Inside Telecom does not endorse these claims, it is reporting what was conveyed discussed with callers, highlighting the significant concerns within the community.
Why Is Her Employer Staying Silent on the Growing Controversy?
Nadine Barakat holds a position as an HR Manager at a Virginia-based IT services and consulting firm known for its work in software development, cybersecurity, and systems integration for various U.S. government agencies, including sensitive defense projects. Despite the gravity of the claims and the potential implications for national security, the company has not issued any public statements regarding Barakat’s status or affiliation. This silence leaves a significant gap in public understanding and accountability, raising questions about the firm’s internal actions and oversight regarding an employee with such serious allegations. Given its critical role in national security and its connections to government agencies, the company must take responsibility and address these allegations promptly.
How does a firm entrusted with sensitive government contracts, defense projects, and cybersecurity operations employ someone in a managerial HR role who has made such significant and controversial claims? What measures were taken in assessing and overseeing such an employee, especially given the critical nature of the company’s clientele and responsibilities? It is unusual and concerning that no public announcement or clarification has been made regarding her status, leaving the public and stakeholders in the dark.
Right of Reply: Inside Telecom is ready to publish any official announcement or response from the company regarding Barakat, including whether she remains employed there or not.
Call for Trusted Press and Law Enforcement Collaboration
For over a year, Nadine Barakat has claimed to have sensitive information from unknown sources, possibly linked to a terrorist group or the U.S. government. The troubling aspect is that she may not only be receiving but also sharing sensitive details with these groups, raising serious concerns about national security and the potential flow of information in both directions.
Stay tuned as Inside Telecom will continue its investigation into these serious claims, regardless of any actions taken by Ms. Barakat to remove her posts or videos. We are committed to documenting everything thoroughly and ensuring that the facts are presented clearly and accurately. Our responsibility as a media outlet is to keep the public informed, and we will pursue the truth with professionalism and objectivity, while remaining impartial in our coverage.
If any trusted press outlet or U.S. law enforcement agency in the U.S. wishes to communicate, review, share or receive documented evidence for further investigation related to this case, please contact us at press@insidetelecom.com. We are committed to ensuring that the information is handled with the utmost integrity and transparency.