Will The FBI and CIA Investigate Codeplus Inc for Hiding Documents with Highly Sensitive Information Related to Terrorism, Weaponry and Drug Dealings, Money Laundry and Corruption, Which Could Threaten National Security in the USA?

In a recent investigation conducted by InsideTelecom, it has come to light that a Lebanese Immigrant with an American Passport named Nadine Barakat, who assumed her husband’s surname of Aboushakra, and is employed at a company known as CodePlus Inc, located in Virginia has been implicated in composing articles with the intention of tarnishing the reputation of Mountasser Hachem. Interestingly, the president and CEO of Code Plus Inc. who shares the same surname of Mrs. Nadine’s Husband, is Jinan Aboushakra. Mr. Hachem, the esteemed founder and chairman of Monty Holding, is a distinguished figure in the business realm and a thought leader in telecom and fintech industry. He initially made his mark in the telecommunications sector with the establishment of Monty Mobile, subsequently recognizing opportunities in the Fintech industry. This led to the creation of Monty Finance, a pioneering enterprise aimed at spearheading financial inclusion and innovation for marginalized populations worldwide.

In her articles and Facebook posts, Nadine has levied accusations against Mountasser, alleging the possession of illegitimate private jets without providing substantiating documentation. It is imperative to highlight that any private jets with regulatory issues would be prohibited from landing at airports worldwide, yet Mountasser’s private jets have been able to fly all over the world. Even in the scenario of outstanding bills or maintenance needs, these jets would not be permitted to undergo repairs and would remain grounded at airports, incurring costs for their owners without any operational benefit. It is worth noting that considering the demands of Mountasser’s business, such aircraft are essential for facilitating urgent business meetings and negotiations.

“Possession of illegitimate private jets without providing substantiating documentation”

In addition, she claimed ownership of a non-existent UK company, even misnaming it. However, upon closer inspection, Monty UK Global Limited has been registered since August 2013 under number 08632740 and continues to operate. All its accounts and financial dealings are publicly transparent, demonstrating a commendable operating record. For more details, you can access the official registration information here: Monty UK Global Limited.

Her accusation of Mr. Montasser Hachem having invaded the Gefinor Center warrants clarification. Contrary to the assertions made, Mr. Hachem is the proprietor of a longstanding telecommunications enterprise, spanning nearly a quarter-century, which opened job opportunities to over a thousand families in Lebanon. He has not “invaded” the Gefinor building; rather, he occupies it through legally executed lease agreements between his affiliated companies and the property owners. These lease contracts are duly registered with the Beirut municipality, affirming their validity and legality.

Accusations of involvement with illicit activities!

Moreover, she has explicitly included accusations of involvement with illicit activities such as weaponry and drug dealings, terrorism, money laundering, corruption, and being complicit with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, all of which are serious allegations that demand thorough investigation and substantiation. She also accused Mr. Montasser Hachem of affiliations with a military group and illicit trades, laundering money for Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Carlos Ghosson, which raises concerns regarding the credibility and integrity of her claims. If such a person with such criminal records exists, he would be the most wanted criminal of all time… which makes these claims questionable, and suggests one of two possibilities: either she is affiliated with a terrorist group and therefore inventing false information to create distraction, or she has falsified alleged documents against Mr. Hachem

However, any such documents should be reported to authorities and would need to be thoroughly examined to determine their authenticity and relevance. And that leaves us wondering, who does she work for? Where does she get her information from? What is her agenda and whether she is a double agent or not? More importantly, if someone has all this information, wouldn’t the FBI and CIA be intrigued since it is something that poses a threat to national security?

Such accusations, if supported by credible evidence, can have severe legal implications, particularly in the United States, where laws such as the “Duty to Warn” doctrine mandate reporting of potential threats to national security:

The “Duty to Warn” doctrine, which may require individuals to report threats of violence or harm to law enforcement authorities. Failure to report such threats in certain situations could potentially lead to legal consequences.

Failure to adhere to these legal obligations may result in legal consequences, including criminal charges. In relation to the proof she has about the accusations made against Mountasser Hachem, rumor has it she keeps it not at home, but in the drawer of her desk where she works as HR manager at Code Plus Inc., located at 2750 Prosperity Ave, Suite 230, Fairfax, VA 22031.
Furthermore, allegations of this nature not only implicate Mr. Hachem but also cast suspicion on the company with which Nadine is associated, especially considering the familial ties between her and the company’s CEO. Therefore, it is imperative to approach such accusations with caution and rigorously assess the validity of the claims before drawing any conclusions or taking legal action. Any unsubstantiated allegations can have far-reaching consequences, not only for the individuals involved but also for the reputation and integrity of the organizations associated with them.
It is worth noting that Mr. Mountasser was recently in Miami and New York this month, actively engaged in business endeavors, including the launch of a digital bank in the USA.
It’s puzzling to consider why Nadine might be taking such actions. One possibility is that she could be aiming to sideline Mountasser to benefit her own company, an IT and software firm, in a specific tender, especially considering the stark difference in scale between her company and Mountasser’s, being international giants in the IT and software sector. Alternatively, if she has recently departed from the company, her motives could stem from a desire to cause trouble and discredit her former employer. These speculations raise questions about the nature of any recent conflicts or disagreements between her and Mountasser, as well as potential personal or professional grievances. Furthermore, given her job as the HR Manager at Code Plus Inc., how does she actively plan to ruin someone’s reputation with no evidence whatsoever. Therefore, it’s worth exploring whether there might be any evidence of collusion with competitors or other ulterior motives behind her accusations. Overall, the motivations driving her actions remain unclear, leaving room for speculation and further investigation.
On Friday, April 5, 2024, a team of legal experts went from Lebanon to Washington DC with 2 purposes: to inform the FBI and CIA about the allegations Nadine Barakat is making about him as they pose a threat to national security in case they were true, and to initiate legal proceedings against Nadine Barakat for her defamatory actions against Mountasser Hachem. The gravity of her accusations cannot be understated, as they not only tarnish Mountasser’s reputation but can also pose a significant threat to his business ventures, his family’s well-being, and his employees’ source of income in a country struck by a financial crisis. Inside Telecom sources have confirmed that the legal team will be seeking damages amounting to more than $5 million, reflecting the severe impact of the defamation on Mountasser’s livelihood and integrity.
The pursuit of justice will spare no effort, as the legal team is prepared to employ every available resource to ensure accountability and set a precedent for those who seek to spread falsehoods for personal gain. The legal proceedings will extend across borders, seeking validation and rectification from competent legal authorities both domestically and internationally.

In one of her FaceBook posts, Nadine Barakat claims she’s merely relaying information from trusted sources, but this is not our problem to solve, the verdict lies with US authorities to assess the truth behind the situation. Since the documents and the sources she claims she has are trusted, it is her duty to present the document to US authorities as it is an issue of national security, because she is claiming he is affiliated with terrorism, and he is involved in weaponry and drug dealings. Many innocent American citizens may be traumatized by such information and this could lead to a state of public panic, unless she is trying to sell these sources to certain parties, which is punishable by law.

On the other hand, if she is falsely claiming that she has these documents, it also makes her liable in the court of law, and the consequences could be severe.

Those impacted by the malicious tweets and articles will not be satisfied with mere retractions or apologies. Instead, they will pursue legal recourse through every available judicial avenue to uphold justice and safeguarding reputations. This pursuit serves as a vital lesson in ethics and underscores the critical importance of distinguishing between freedom of expression and defamation.