Why Telehealth Matters Now More Than Ever

What are important differences between telehealth and in-person care? Telehealth is reshaping healthcare through digital tools.

What are important differences between telehealth and in-person care? Telehealth is reshaping healthcare through digital tools like video visits, mobile apps, and remote monitoring yet pending policy decisions may determine whether this virtual care revolution continues or stops.

Telehealth today is powered by a variety of technology requirements for telehealth from mobile health apps and wearable sensors to video platforms and remote patient monitoring (RPM). These tools are reshaping the patient provider dynamic, allowing care to take place across vast distances.

With 95% of Americans technology needed for telehealth is owning cell phones, patients can use mobile apps to track medications, monitor chronic conditions, or consult doctors via video. A Wyoming Medicaid study linked the prenatal app “Due Date Plus” to higher care compliance and fewer low-birth-weight outcomes.

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has also proven to be a game changer. Devices collect and transmit data such as blood pressure, oxygen levels, and glucose readings. These innovations help detect health issues earlier and support better chronic care management.

 “Patients often go months without seeing their providers. RPM can allow for earlier detection of complications,” the article notes.

Additionally, store-and-forward technology allows clinicians to review diagnostic images and patient records asynchronously, vital in settings with specialist shortages. The South Carolina Department of Corrections, for instance, uses high-resolution cameras and video scopes to treat inmates remotely, reducing costs and improving safety.

Is Telehealth as Effective as in Person

A recent JAMA study compared face-to-face with telehealth palliative care in 1,250 lung cancer patients at 22 sites. The result of the study was that virtual care was just as effective in improving quality of life.

“This study is really important for providing Congress with the evidence that they need to support the concept of extending waivers,” said a Yale School of Medicine expert and study co-author, Dr. Lee Schwamm.

Yet even as evidence mounts in favor of telehealth and the person in charge of medical decisions, policymakers remain divided. Medicare’s damages model still limits payments to patients in rural or designated shortage areas, and fewer than half of state Medicaid programs cover all major telehealth modalities. Meanwhile, private insurers are guided by inconsistent state laws.

“This isn’t just a statistical dip—it’s a fundamental shift,” said Kurt Hackett of Rethink Capital, noting that demand for in-person care is resurging as emergency-era telehealth flexibilities fade.

Digital fatigue, trust in face-to-face care, and remote patient monitoring companies are driving providers back to physical clinics.

 “Telehealth has become such an important part of medical care,” said from the Yale New Haven Hospital, Dr. Dmitry Kozhevnikov. “It has really increased access to the patients who need it the most.”

Final Thoughts

Telehealth has proven its worth in expanding care access, reducing costs, and matching the quality of traditional visits particularly for underserved and chronically ill patients. Yet policy decisions now threaten its continued push. With technologies like RPM, mHealth, and AI enhanced diagnostics becoming more integral, failing to adapt regulations risks pushing the healthcare system backward.

Congress must act not just to preserve virtual care, but to modernize reimbursement models that reflect the evolving tech-driven realities of healthcare. Telehealth is no longer a temporary fix, it’s an initial tool for 21st century medicine.

Telehealth cost savings reflect a broader shift toward digitized, decentralized healthcare. As tech giants, insurers, and hospital networks invest in remote platforms, the industry faces an important choice, integrate virtual care into long-term infrastructure or risk losing ground.

From rural medicine to mental health, the implications of connecting doctors and patients extend well beyond convenience telehealth could be key to solving America’s access and equity crises in care.


Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the Tech industry. Keep an eye on our Medtech section to stay informed and updated with our daily articles.