On August 19, China’s DeepSeek entered the global AI fight with force, launching its $1.01 AI coding model, with 685 billion parameters and elite performance in the global AI affordability.
The model scored 71.6% on coding benchmarks, outperforming Claude Opus 4 while costing 68 times less, though it requires high-end hardware. DeepSeek’s V3.1 intensifies the US-China AI race as companies are focusing more on efficiency over raw spending.
The release isn’t incremental, but more of a statement. DeepSeek, once viewed as an emerging loser, is now seen as a viable AI warrior able to stand up to the biggest industry giants.
The V3.1 model follows its predecessor, R1, which gained attention with speed, logic, and value. But V3.1 takes a step further by debuting with the power and size to take on giants like OpenAI and Anthropic.
China’s DeepSeek Raises Questions Over U.S. Technological Dominance
V3.1 specs are quite impressive, with 685 billion parameters, and can handle volumes of data, meaning intelligent conversation and superior handling of complex tasks. It supports flexible tensor formats like BF16 and F8_E4M3 that use fewer bits to process data faster with slightly less accuracy, and F32 that offers high detail but uses more memory. These formats are different ways AI models handle numbers, balancing between speed and precision.
At around $1.01 for every complete coding assignment, DeepSeek V3.1 is an extremely economical choice over traditional systems which cost $70 or more to initiate. That kind of pricing is causing the industry to rethink big tech spending on AI.
“Deepseek v3.1 scores 71.6% on aider – non-reasoning SOTA,” AI researcher Andrew Christianson tweeted, noting it even outperforms Claude Opus 4 by 1% while being “68 times cheaper.” That puts DeepSeek in a unique position both in terms of price and performance and competitive enough to enter the AI fight.
With all that power, developers are closely watching the DeepSeek V3 hardware requirements. It’s not easy to run a model this big, it takes high-end infrastructure, but still more efficiently than most Western equivalents.
AI Is Finally Resulting in Real Growth for Big Tech
V3.1 excels in real-world performance. Compared to OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4.5, DeepSeek demonstrates stronger logical structure and technical reasoning.
A DeepSeek vs ChatGPT comparison shows users highlighting that the Chinese model organizes thoughts more clearly, especially content planning, problem-solving, and code generation.
DeepSeek shows intelligent reasoning but misses minor details in academic training. ChatGPT, however, gave more complete academic answers but without DeepSeek’s thoughtfulness and memory recall. This ack-and-forth is the AI battle of the day: accuracy or process.
What presents DeepSeek’s AI as a competitive advantage is its reasoning – despite minor academic details. ChatGPT, on the other hand, offers thorough – yet less thoughtful – answers with weaker recall.
Today’s AI fight requires central AI trade-off, focusing on accuracy over process.
For coding, DeepSeek required slight adjustments but produced cleaner, more interactive interfaces. ChatGPT delivered better initial consistency but lacked design flair. This DeepSeek vs ChatGPT comparison shows AI’s competitive edge now hinges on two pillars: context and user needs. Even in creative tasks like outlining, DeepSeek delivered structured, human-like reasoning.
“Let me start by recalling what I know about LLMs,” the model started, before entering main points concisely which is a trait many found interesting.
Since major US tech giants like Meta and Google are leading the way in developing advanced AI technologies, Chinese tech companies such as DeepSeek are emerging as strong competitors.
Meanwhile, Meta AI’s competition with Google is still ongoing, but it’s new players like DeepSeek that are shaking the foundation.
“We are witnessing the advent of AI mass adoption, this goes beyond national competition,” said Louis Liang, an investor at Ameba Capital.
The current AI fight isn’t just between countries or budgets, it’s about who can build smarter, faster, and more affordable tools. And if DeepSeek V3.1 is truly delivering what it promises, it marks a shift in strategy: China’s AI firms are prioritizing efficiency over raw size and spending.
But without official validation from DeepSeek itself, there’s a growing question in the AI competition industry: how much of this hype is grounded in real-world performance, and how much is still speculative fiction?
Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Tech sections to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.