Tech

US Copyright Law Will Not Protect AI Art Created from Text Prompts 

  • Reading time: 2 min
generative AI tools using text prompts will not be qualify for an AI art copyright law, setting a legal precedent for AI-generated content. 

On January 17, the US Copyright Office confirmed that visual art created by generative AI tools using text prompts will not be qualify for an AI art copyright law, setting a legal precedent for AI-generated content. 

The copyright laws on AI art establish clear legal boundaries between human-created art and AI-generated art, intensifying the ongoing debate over intellectual property linked to AI.  

The US Copyright Office report, Copyright and Artificial Intelligence: Copyrightability, was released by the US Copyright Office, assessed the copyright eligibility of visual art produced with the help of AI tools.   

The main goal of the AI art copyright law was to put a line between AI generated content (could be protected by copyright law) and those that fall outside of current regulations. 

According to the report, art generated by AI requires more human input than a simple text prompt. For example, additional creative decisions or significant artistic modifications may still be entitled to copyright protection. 

In parallel, AI-generated works from text prompts are not covered under US copyright law.  

The US copyright decision highlights how copyright law AI art has some minimum degree of human creativity and authorship for a work to qualify for protection. 

The leading reasoning for this AI art copyright law decision is that the US Copyright Office considers that text prompts alone do not suffice to show sufficient human writing.  

Even though a highly detailed prompt may lead AI toward creating very specific and complex artwork, the creation is still a product of AI tools interpreting the instruction and not an expression of the user’s creativity. 

“No matter how many times a prompt is revised and resubmitted, the final output reflects the user’s acceptance of the AI system’s interpretation, rather than authorship of the expression it contains,” the report explains. 

The AI art and copyright law decision is important to artists as explicate that even as AI image generators produce original and visually appealing art, the lack of human intervention in the creation of such works prevents its protection under any AI art copyright law. 

Value for Art Creators 

AI image generators can still be a good tool to create creative works, without any copyright protection, AI generated images cannot legally be considered intellectual property. 

A decision such as this directly affects AI artists seeking to sell or distribute their work, as a lack of copyright facilitates a free use or reproduction of the images with no legal implications. 

Be that as it may, AI Art is still a collectively cool tool facilitating oneself expression in various creations. As always, artists may keep utilizing the generative AI platform in an unlimited, experimenting manner, to find different paths, develop some unique idea that drives a surge toward generating enormous works.  

However, artists shall remain careful when sharing or selling their creations, in order to not contradict AI art copyright laws. 

Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Tech sections to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.

Tags: