Is Zuckerberg the Expediter of Instagram's Tarnished Trust?

Instagram has found itself in a precarious position, traversing a maze of public trust issues and controversies for its content moderation.

In recent times, the social media behemoth Instagram has found itself in a precarious position, traversing a maze of public trust issues and controversies, driven by the company’s content moderation.

Despite being a private technology company, Instagram, this subsidiary of Meta, operates with a surprising level of autonomy that leaves many questioning the supervision of its activities.

The social networking giant’s ongoing struggles to maintain user trust emanate from a series of, let’s call it mishaps and scandals, especially when we’re talking about its algorithms.

A recent exposé by The Wall Street Journal highlighted a disturbing scenario where Instagram’s Reels feature recommended sexualized content of children to adult users. This uncovering has only deepened the platform’s trust issues with its user base and the platform’s content moderation policies.

Now, despite Meta’s efforts to introduce new features and products with the sole aim of rebuilding trust – which we all know cannot happen easily – these initiatives have proven inadequate in the eyes of many users.

Central to this discussion is the figure of Mark Zuckerberg. You know him, Meta’s CEO? Yes, the one and only.

Zuck’s leadership and accountability have been brought into question. Unlike the controversial Elon Musk, Meta’s CEO’s quieter demeanor does not necessarily mean effective management of his company’s societal impact. Going back to the Summer of 2022, dubbed “Hot Zuck Summer,” we saw Zuckerberg bask in a more propitious light, contrary to Musk’s turbulent $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, now branded as X.

Newsflash, the social networking chief’s respite was short-lived. But again, that shouldn’t come as a big surprise.

The recent scandal has reset the clock on Meta’s scandal-free days, stressing the never-ending hurdles the company faces in regulating its content.

The WSJ‘s findings, which showed Instagram’s algorithm pushing inappropriate content, can only be views as the platform’s underlying issues. These uncoverings have led to major backlash from the public and rights advocates, respectfully, with major advertisers withdrawing their support.

A coalition of 33 states has sued Meta, accusing the networking giant of intentionally neglecting the well-being of young users. The lawsuit, coupled with another from Massachusetts, highlighted a growing concern over the platform’s impact on youth mental health. In an attempt to defend themselves, Instagram’s executives, including Adam Mosseri, did indeed acknowledge the exposures of social comparison inherent in the platform, likening it to the existential threat that election interference posed to Facebook between 2016 and 2017. Not so surprisingly, another reason that heavily fractured the trust between Meta’s users and its networking platforms.

But the question is, what does a social media company have to do with elections? We’re “connecting the world and bringing users closer.” We’ll give you that one Meta, but wouldn’t election manipulation drift people apart instead of bringing them closer? Just thinking out loud there.

The quandary Meta finds itself in is not just about algorithmic missteps or poor content moderation. It’s more than that. The bottom line is that it is nothing but a question of corporate responsibility and ethical technology use. While Meta emphasizes that its platforms are designed for ‘safe, age-appropriate experiences,’ the reality portrayed by recent investigations paints a different picture.

Instagram’s autonomy and lack of accountability from its top administration, particularly Zuckerberg, only add to the complexity of this social dilemma.

Inside Telecom provides you with an extensive list of content covering all aspects of the tech industry. Keep an eye on our Ethical Tech section to stay informed and up-to-date with our daily articles.